Sign-in
   
 
      << Back to Homepage  
      Printer friendly pagePrinter friendly page  
  ESIP reponds to the public consultation on rare diseases      
  ESIP expresses its views on Social Reality in Europe      
  ESIP's European Conference 2007 took place on 29 November      
  ESIP responds to consultation on the future of pharmaceuticals      
  ESIP calls for an EU quality label for patient information      
         
  ESIP reponds to the public consultation on rare diseases      
  The joint position paper of ESIP and MEDEV in response to the European Commission public consultation on 'Rare Diseases: Europe's Challenge' can be downloaded here.  
      top  
  ESIP expresses its views on Social Reality in Europe      
 

On 22 January 2008, ESIP submitted its views to the European Commission in response to the consultation paper of the Bureau of European Policy Advisors on "Europe's Social Reality" published in February 2007.

First and foremost, ESIP clearly reiterates its commitment to a social security, based on the principles of solidarity, universality, equity, accessibility and social cohesion that will continue to cover the whole of society and not only the most disadvantaged.

ESIP welcomes and supports the European initiatives concerning equality between men and women pointing out that the social security systems have to a large extent already adjusted to the changing role of women in society and in the economy by individualising pension rights for women, harmonising the retirement age for men and women and linking certain social services to the provision of parenting and care activities rather than to family status. ESIP expresses its concerns however about the increasing shift of social security from public to private systems, and even to completely voluntary systems, which disadvantage women due to the structuring of premiums according to sex.

With regard to benchmarking the social systems of the Member States, ESIP expresses its concerns about reliance on “firm indicators” which represent only a snapshot of the current situation and which do not provide information on cultural backgrounds and underlying values, on the (objective) quality of the systems analyzed or on anticipated trends.

It nevertheless welcomes a broad-based analysis of subjective “wellbeing” in the various Member States which could provide an interesting insight into the similarities and differences in the subjective perception of the social environment. However, ESIP warns against drawing political conclusions on backgrounds and determining factors for failures or successes of social policy intervention or even quality of performance of social protection systems based directly on individual perceptions. In this context, ESIP has repeatedly opposed the use of indicators to measure “self-reported health status” and “unmet need” for the purpose of benchmarking healthcare systems. The same care should be applied in other social fields.

Background
The European Commission initiated a consultation process on “Europe’s social reality” in February 2007 with a questionnaire designed to feed in to current or future initiatives at European level such as reviewing the European Social Agenda. A summary of the findings was published in a Commission Communication on 20 November 2007 (COM (2007)726 final).

ESIP's position paper can be downloaded by clicking here.

For further information contact Wolfgang Schulz-Weidner at wolgang.schulz-weidner@esip.org

 
      top  
  ESIP's European Conference 2007 took place on 29 November      
 
The European Social Insurance Platform (ESIP) held its 4th European Conference entitled "Financing Social Security - a European perspective" on 29 November 2007, in Luxemburg under the Presidency of the Association Luxembourgeoise des Organismes de Sécurité Sociale (ALOSS).

 

The Conference took a serious look at the very real challenges currently facing Europe as regards the long-term financing of its social security systems, in particular with a view to pensions but also to healthcare and long-term care. The challenges arising from the Lisbon strategy and the recent trends in the development of the "social reality" across Europe create a need for appropriate policy responses in all social security sectors. In addition, globalisation, demographic and societal changes, transnational migration as well as flexibility and security ("flexicurity") in our social systems are all factors to be considered in the planning and organisation of social security finances. Against this background the Conference went on to analysis various national reactions to these challenges with the aim of identifying sustainable solutions for financing social security while maintaining the overarching principles of the European Social Model - equity, solidarity, universal access.

 

Opening, Mr Mars Di Bartolomeo, Luxemburg Minister for Health and Social Security, spoke out strongly in support of Europe’s national social protection systems inviting the audience to say “yes” to reforms and adjustments within those systems but “no” to putting in question and dismantling the systems to bring social protection in line with Internal Market demands. He stressed the need to demonstrate the added value of solidarity based social protection and regretted the lack of studies and data evaluating the overall positive impact of social security. Presenting the available data, Mr Georg Fischer of the European Commission, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, was able to show a common trend across the 27 Member States towards financing social security by increased contributions from the State budget and lower social contributions raised from salaries. Professor Alain Euzeby, Professor at the Institute of French Political Studies in Grenoble, then presented numerous arguments in favour of solidarity based social protection, claiming that social financing is a pillar of the European Social Model and that having a high level of social protection does not conflict with a high level of economic performance but rather supports it.

 

From the point of view of the social partners, it appears there is a common view that social protection is necessary to ensure social cohesion. However, according to Mr Pierre Bley, Secretary General of the Luxemburg Employer’s Association (UEL), lower social contributions were necessary to reduce the costs of work. Clearly different opinions were expressed on the level of responsibility accorded to the individual (savings plans and private insurance). In addition, Ms Gabrielle Clotuche, Senior Advisor to the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC), reiterated the need for European-level action to establish rules on certain aspects of social protection in light of citizens’ mobility and the realities of the single market.

 

Finally the Conference took a look at the particular challenges facing three Member States - Poland, the UK and France, represented by ESIP’s member organisations, and the practical solutions they had brought to their national pension systems. Such exchanges of practice and experience are fostered by ESIP and its members - it is one of the added values of our European Platform.

 

Proceedings of the Conference will be published in the Bulletin Luxembourgeois des Questions Sociales (BLQS). Click here to view the pesentations from the Conference.

 

 
      top  
  ESIP responds to consultation on the future of pharmaceuticals      
 

On 12 October, ESIP and MEDEV (Medicines Evaluation Committee) submitted their joint response to the European Commssion consultation paper on "The future of pharmaceuticals for human use in Europe: making Europe a hub for safe and innovative medicines" of 19 July. In their joint paper, ESIP and MEDEV comment on the challenges facing industry and patients raised by the Commission paper (globalisation, internal market, scientific advances in science and technology). They also pinpoint further issues that need to be addressed by the legislation including environmental issues and propose the following concrete actions to be carried out by the Commission in cooperation with the Member States and stakeholders:

  •  a comprehensive reflection process to identify those parts of the European pharmaceutical industry that need strengthening in order to ensure the sustainable supply of safe and affordable medicines to patients in Europe and worldwide
  •  increased transparency in all areas related to the supply of safe medicines in Europe through the establishment of publicly accessible databases e.g. on prices, pharmacovigilance and clinical trials data
  •  patient reporting of adverse effects to improve the safety of medicines and increase patient involvement
  •  no weakening on the current ban on DTCA of prescription medicines
  •  establishing a programme of priority medicines and licensing pharmaceuticals of public health interest to improve access to needed medicines
  •  improving Europe’s science base by establishing centres of excellence for research
  •  implementing measures to increase the economic welfare of poorer countries to improve access to medicines
  • establishing a correction mechanism to counter monopoly markets as part of adjustments to the current EU regulatory framework

Click on the appropriate link to download the ESIP-MEDEV joint posiiton paper and the EC consultation document. For further information, please contact Chris Dawson

 
      top  
  ESIP calls for an EU quality label for patient information      
 

In its reponse to the public consultation on the Commission Draft report on current practice with regards to provision of information to patients on medicinal products" ESIP:

  • Calls to retain a strict ban on direct to consumer advertising (DTCA)
  • Urges the European Institutions to keep Article 88, paragraphs 1 and 3 of Directive 2001//81/EC as amended by 2004/27/EC unchanged
  • Calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve public awareness of and access to existing sources of high-quality, evidence-based and patient-centered information
  • Encourages the Commission and the Member States to establish a network of competent authorities to exchange good practices and existing information
  • Supports the idea of a quality label for good information to patients and asks the Commission to make a feasibility study for its implementation

ESIP's position was submitted to the European Commission on 29 June.

To download ESIP's full submission, please click here.

 
      top  
  Last Modified: February 15, 2008